PC Specs : I have a Ryzen 7 3800X , a RTX 2070 Super and 32 GB of ram! They tend to "recommend" one of two things - workstation cards (Quadro/Radeon Pro) or the highest-end consumer card. I've installed the latest studio driver (456.55), but have tried the next-to-latest as well. Help. Does CC v13 change these results at all? PC Specs : I have a Ryzen 7 3800X , a RTX 2070 Super and 32 GB of ram! Puget Systems builds custom PCs tailor-made for your workflow. Starting with the 14.2 version, Premiere Pro and Media Encoder now support NVENC hardware encoding. It will work for awhile but then eventually the program monitor will go black. We are really talking about a ~5-10% difference in performance between the RTX 2080 Ti and the GTX 1070, however, so you likely won't notice a massive difference between any of the NVIDIA cards we tested unless you are doing exports that take several hours to complete. There are really only a few reasons you might want to use one of the more expensive RTX cards for Premiere Pro. Seems like there were some references to v13 being better capable of utilizing GPU power.thanks. Ah, sorry, I misread your comment as RTX 2070. Don't go by Adobe's supported hardware lists pretty much. Adobe Premiere Pro 2019 13.1.5 (47) CPU: i7 6700k, iGPU: Intel HD Graphics 530, Dedicated GPU: NVidia RTX 2070 Super Founders Edition, 2x8GB Kingston DDR4, Motherboard: Asus Z170 Pro Gaming, PSU: Corsair RMX 750W, 500GB M.2 Nvme Samsung. Matt Bach I just got the RTX 2070 but whenever I choose Mercury Playback Engine GPU Acceleration (CUDA) within Premiere Pro, I can't play anything back because the program monitor goes black. This Premiere Pro Workstation is built around the AMD Ryzen 9 platform with an RTX 2070 Super. Should you use a NVIDIA SUPER or AMD Radeon GPU for Premiere Pro? thanks for the speedy reply, Matt Bach. In every case, using an NVIDIA GeForce video card will give you better performance than an AMD Radeon GPU in Premiere Pro. Personally, I would go the 1070 Ti route for a pure editing machine, although if it is a mixed use system, the RTX 2060 may be the better call as more and more applications should start leveraging things like RT and Tensor cores in the future. If you are interested in how the RTX cards perform in other applications, be sure to check out our recent Video Card articles as we have (or are working on) a number of other articles for the RTX 2080 and RTX 2080 Ti. I have an asus rog zephyrus m rtx 2070, i have some issues with editing at 4k with rtx 2070. Support, tips & tricks, discussions, and critique requests are welcome! i wanna know which one is best for video editing and rendering rtx 2060 or gtx 1070 ti. I know about the recent h.264 files using integrated graphics 'problem' , and i have found out that is not the issue with me. You have to find the file named cuda-supported-cards, in the program folder for premiere pro, and open this file in a text editor and add the "Geforce RTX 2070".You have to do the exact name including capitals!!! That means that you can expect slightly better performance than what is shown in this article, but the relative difference between each GPU should be pretty much the same. Our guess is that they will eventually be leveraged in some way via Adobe Sensei, but whether it will happen in Premiere Pro CC 2020 or Premiere Pro CC 2030 is unknown at the moment. P.S I also have a laptop with GTX 1050 , and the GPU is being utilized in my laptop with no issue whatsoever. CUDA (NVIDIA using its graphics cores for computational purposes) is used in Premiere for gpu acclerated effects. If neither works, you could fully uninstall/reinstall Premiere Pro or try a driver cleaner (I like ddu driver cleaner) before installing the GPU driver. What makes these new RTX cards hard to review and test is the fact that Premiere Pro currently does not use either of these new types of cores. Every time I attempt to export an H.264 video from Adobe Premiere (2020 latest patch), the GPU hard-crashes... either freezing my screen or turning it black. Not used in a ton of games right now, but I think it will be used more and more in the future. To be honest, that is one of the reasons why we do the amount of testing that we do. GPU-Z can show detailed utilization of card's resources in "sensors" tab (thanks andy for the tip). From the testing I've done so far with CC 2019, it looks like we are getting about 8% higher performance in the new version of Premiere Pro. A perfect score would be "100" which would mean that the system did not drop any frames even with the most difficult codecs and timelines. With up to 128GB of memory on the X570 motherboard, and support for PCI 4.0 NVME, this is … I just built a new PC around the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (MSI VENTUS GP OC). GeForce RTX ® 2070 SUPER ™ features a dedicated hardware encoder that unlocks the ability to game and stream simultaneously with superior quality. However, keep in mind that while Adobe may add support for NVLink in the future (which might allow things like memory pooling between multiple cards), it is currently completely unknown whether Adobe applications will ever be able to use it or how they will implement it. And on the CPU, the i7 8700 is definitely better. NVIDIA's new RTX 3080 10GB and RTX 3090 24GB cards are touted as having significant performance advantages over previous generations, but will this make any difference for the typical Premiere Pro user? Premiere Pro is often more limited by the power of your CPU, but in the most extreme cases the new RTX 2070 SUPER and 2080 SUPER are about 10% faster than their "normal" predecessors, while the RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB can be almost 20% faster. HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING . On the subject of your laptop, if (I assume) it has Intel CPU, then it has that dual-graphics thing and uses Intel iGPU for h264 playback. Someone please help me out , any suggestions would be helpful . Help. There is a slight difference when using RED media, but even then the RTX cards were only slightly faster than the current GTX cards. Dedicated RTX ray tracing technologies also enable users … PC configuration:h370 chipsetI7-8700 3.2 / 4.6 Ghz Core 6 CPU32 GB Ram ddr4 2400 Mhzssd 480 Samsung 860 EVOVideo card gtx 1080ti or rtx 2070. Exporting through Adobe Media Encoder gives us a bit larger of a difference delta the cards we tested compared to Live Playback. Will try that right now! Please reply to this with your answers. In essence, a score of "80" would mean that on average that CPU was able to play our timelines at 80% of the tested media's FPS. Hi Alex, I’ve done some test during this days with the K4000 and the last version of Premiere Pro. RTX 2070 Super or NVidea Quadro P2200? Best of luck with your new system :). It's possible you just have a defective GPU. Here, the RTX 3070 edges ahead of the previous generation RTX 2070 SUPER by a respectable 10%. ok i will buy it , thank you very much for your time :), If you can swing it, the new RTX 2060 Super would get you the best of both worlds: 8GB and RTX tech, along with slightly better performance too :). because i dont know which is the best for me ,More VRAM, or newer features like Tensor/RT ? I bought an RTX 2070 but our indie feature (in post-prod) is using a lot of GPU-accelerated effects. RTX 2070 SUPER显卡Premiere Pro性能测试：剪辑高清视频也照样行 . Adobe has been focusing fairly heavily on GPU performance in the latest versions of Premiere Pro, adding more GPU accelerated effects as well as GPU-based hardware encoding. I'm noticing it seems to fail most frequently when I'm switching between sequences. If you would like to skip over our test setup and benchmark result/analysis sections, feel free to jump right to the Conclusion section. My laptop have 2 modes, discrept card and optimus. Once again, it uses CPU when playing back. While not utilized in Adobe applications today, these cores may be used in the future - especially as Adobe continues to develop their "Adobe Sensei" AI and machine learning technology. You could also try the new creator ready drivers from Nvidia's driver download page, and during the install check the box for "perform a clean install". thank you for replying but i cant find Rtx 2060 in the article and i have to choose between this systems for new pc i will buy soon but i dont know which one is the best for me , i will use them for for graphics , video editing and rendering for videos too besides gaming ,so i will write the essential then tell me which one is best for me i7-8700 or i5-9400Gtx 1070 ti or Rtx 2060so which one is best for me because Rtx 2060 is not iculded in article to see the difference between it and Gtx 1070 ti. Those cards are neck-and-neck in Premiere Pro, as shown above. ?I'm not sure which of these two cards to choose for 4K video editing. No real reason in Premiere Pro to go up to the RTX 2080 since you shouldn't see any real performance difference. I also want to game but not a lot also 3 more gigs of vRam is gonna be useful. Cineform (and DNx/most other codecs for that matter) don't use the GPU for decoding. The "Live Playback Score" shown in the chart above is a representation of the average performance we saw with each processor for this test. So it will come down to whether you want to future proof a bit with the higher VRAM on the 1070 Ti, or future proof by having the RT/Tensor cores on the RTX 2060. I know about the power management settings , and i have set 'Prefer maximum performance' for premiere pro from the NVIDIA control panel. Also that includes Lumetri Color. SKU: 48101 Signa 4K/6K Premiere Pro / DaVinci Resolve Video Editing PC Your choice: nVidia RTX 2060, 2070 Super OR 3080 10GB Your choice: Intel Core i7 10700K OR Intel Core i9 10900K 10 Core Up To 5.3Ghz Asus Prime Z490-P Desktop Workstation Motherboard Your choice: 32GB, 64GB OR 128GB 3200MHz DDR4 Memory 1TB NVME FAST Turbo Solid State Drive Fractal Design Define C Black Case … If you are looking for GPU based rendering tests like Matt mentioned, we have a host of articles covering that! Try resetting Premiere Pro back to default (hold alt whole launching the program). GTX 1080Ti or RTX 2070? BOXX “Beasts” Deliver Professional-Grade Performance Is really strange. However, this does make the RTX 2070 a solid choice as it performs just as well as the much more expensive models. iam sorry but iam confused because iam still beginner to know the difference between if i wanted More VRAM, or newer features like Tensor/RT for the best performance in both of video editing programs like after effects or premiere pro ... etcso to avoid disturbing you by asking more question, because i dont wanna you to getupset from me :D, just tell me which one i should buy 1070 ti or 2060? Networking (Mellanox) SELF-DRIVING CARS. If you use any software that is expected to benefit from the new RTX technology in the near future - like any GPU based rendering engines (Redshift, Octane, etc) then I would lean toward the RTX 2070. Adobe Premiere Pro 2020 performance measures playback and render FPS normalized by clip framerate and length of 1080p and 4K video with Lumetri color and various GPU-accelerated effects enabled. Maybe very slightly, but it is going to be almost impossible to notice the difference in the real world. Premiere Pro GPU Decoding for H.264/HEVC media - is it faster? I would check out our most recent Premiere Pro GPU article: https://www.pugetsystems.co... . Premiere Pro CC 2018: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 & 2080 Ti Performance, Samsung 960 Pro 1TB M.2 PCI-E x4 NVMe SSD, Adobe Premiere Pro - AMD Radeon RX 6800 (XT) Performance, Apple M1 MacBook vs PC Desktop Workstation for Adobe Creative Cloud, Adobe Premiere Pro: AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Adobe Premiere Pro - NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, 3080 & 3090 Performance, Best Workstation PC for V-Ray (Winter 2020), SOLIDWORKS 2020 SP5 AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPU Performance, Best Workstation PC for Metashape (Winter 2020), Agisoft Metashape 1.6.5 SMT Performance Analysis on AMD Ryzen 5000 Series. Sure, we want to know how fast the hardware is, but almost more importantly we need to know that it will work without any issues when we sell it to our customers. The new tensor cores in particular could have significant performance advantages for some tasks, or they might never be used at all. That's why it plays smoothly there. GAMING & ENTERTAINMENT ... GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER, GeForce RTX 2070, GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, GeForce RTX 2060. Building a new workstation, which card will give me less problems with premiere? If you mean ray trace rendering with something like OctaneRender or Redsift, you should look up benchmarks for those applications since the GPU plays a much larger role for performance than it does in most editing software. So I think you juts have to decide between a bit more performance in games (1080 Ti), or making them prettier in the future (2070). Listed below is the test platforms we will be using in our testing: To see how the new RTX cards perform in Premiere Pro, we tested it against a selection of cards from NVIDIA as well as AMD's Vega 64 GPU. Our budget could have stretched to a used 1080Ti (1,280 more CUDA Cores, more though slower memory) but not an RTX 2080Ti. unfortunatily i can't get RTX 2060 super yet in my country and because of my budget, so i only have to choose between GTX 1070 ti or RTX 2060 :/, ok i will buy i7 besiedes 1070ti thank you very much for your time :), Sounds good! Between those two, performance should be pretty close in Pr, but the higher VRAM on the GTX 1080 Ti could come in handy if you start using 4K+ or RAW footage. Yep, that advise still stands. For example, the only GTX 1000 series card they have on there is the 1080 Ti - the entire rest of that line is missing. Price and availability. If I try to force software encoding, cpu goes to 40/50% but the total time is longer than Gpu (mercury engine). What matters more is how many and the type of effects you have applied. I'm working on a VFX-heavy project and I need to know which would be the best codec to work with. In general, however, the CPU is much more important for Premiere Pro than the GPU is. It doesn't look like any one thing in particular, just across the board improvement. These new RTX cards may not be particularly exciting for Premiere Pro right now, but in many ways the real question is whether the RTX GPUs will be good for Premiere Pro in the future. So whenever you have one of those effects applied, then CUDA will be used for computing those effects, whether it's playback, preview rendering or export. NVIDIA Driver 442.74, Windows 1903. A third-party plugin that enables NVDEC support is available. Honestly, you really won't notice the difference between those two cards in Premiere Pro. Both of those cards are included in this testing - the overall scores at the end of the article should give you the best idea of general performance across those cards for Premiere Pro. Super, thank you. Overall, the RTX 2070 in particular is a very solid choice for Premiere Pro as it easily keeps up with the more expensive RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti models. It is possible that Adobe may utilize these cores in After Effects or even Photoshop to some extent, but we feel it is unlikely they will be used much in Premiere Pro. That isn't an issue I've encountered. These tensor cores operate alongside the normal CUDA cores that traditionally do the heavy lifting, but are designed specifically for machine learning inference (running already created and trained machine learning models). Between the RTX models, there was really no difference at all so getting a RTX 2080 Ti shouldn't give you any higher FPS for live playback than even the RTX 2070. When i open a project , i get the option for Cuda rendering , but even upon selecting it , my GPU is not being utilized when scrolling through the timeline or rendering. What is the better GPU for 4K rendering time in Premiere Pro 2020 RTX 2060 Super or Rtx 2070 Super? For exporting video, the chart in this article should be accurate (at least for Premiere Pro). Any suggestions? Often, whether the media we test is RED or not makes a big impact on performance since RED footage uses the GPU for the debayering of the RAW footage. I would need to get GTX used when RTX will be new. The driver also adds support for OptiX 7 for RTX-accelerated ray tracing in Blender Cycles 2.81 Alpha. You gotta clean up your porn collection bro. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. 9 9. comments. However, the more GPU-accelerated effects you use, the greater the benefit to using a higher-end card." Buggy, laggy sofware even on i7, 32GB RAM and 2080 RTX card. A community-run subreddit for Adobe video editing apps including Premiere Pro, Premiere Rush, Premiere Elements, and Media Encoder. Matt Bach hmm still happening. so you think that RTX 2060 will be better than GTX 1070 Ti in using after effects and adobe premiere pro ? If not, the 1080 Ti has a bit more VRAM (11GB vs 8GB on the 2070). Comparing the AMD Radeon RX 5700XT to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (both of which have an MSRP of ~$400), the RTX 2060 SUPER will perform around 10-34% faster depending on … What is the better GPU for 4K rendering time in Premiere Pro 2020 RTX 2060 Super or Rtx 2070 Super? NVDEC is a different story: Adobe still does not natively support NVDEC. PNY GeForce® RTX 2070 Super™ 8GB Blower graphics card based upon the NVIDIA Turing™ architecture accelerates performance by 6x over the previous generation. It really comes down to whether or not the Premiere Pro developers are willing or able to make effectively use of these new features. As a result, the RTX cards get treated as typical CUDA GPUs for the purposes of Premiere Pro's MPE renderer. I believe in most cases, the GTX 1080 Ti should be faster than the RTX 2070, but with the RTX card you get the Ray Tracing features. using 9900k and 64 gb 3200mhz ram with separate m2 drives for footage and cache. Thanks. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. While already available on the more expensive Titan V GPU, the RTX line introduces tensor cores at a more reasonable price point. Unfortunately, Adobe Premiere Pro still relies HEAVILY on legacy CUDA code, and currently makes absolutely no use whatsoever of the newer Tensor technology. The best of both worlds. I did the same for my 2070 super, for the super the name to add is "Geforce RTX 2070 SUPER" Hi There, First Time Poster: I am having issues with Premier Pro 2019 not playing video on my new machine. I've tried to read up on why this may be and it seems the only solution is to render with Mercury Playback Engine Software Only. To thoroughly benchmark each processor, we used a range of codecs across 4K, 6K, and 8K resolutions: Rather than just timing a simple export and calling it a day, we decided to create six different timelines for each codec that represent a variety of different type of workloads. ... A community-run subreddit for Adobe video editing apps including Premiere Pro, Premiere Rush, Premiere Elements, and Media Encoder. As a result, legacy CUDA performance is somewhat slower in the RTX series than it was … The more GPU-accelerated effects, the more a higher-end GPU is going to improve things. It isn't that much faster than the older GTX 1080 or GTX 1080 Ti, so it likely isn't worth a straight upgrade, but if you are already in the market for a new GPU it is likely going to be our most common recommendation. It is honestly unrealistic for most users since it is rare to have that many GPU effects without any CPU-based ones, but that score and our Overall score gives you a range that most people will fall within depending on how many GPU effects they use. I know about the 'cuda_supported_cards.txt' file and have added it with the graphics card's name. If by rendering you mean rendering previews, those are rendered by CPU as well since they're rendered to intra-frame codecs (i-frame MPEG by default, or other if customized). None of the RTX cards quite catch up to the more expensive Titan V, but they all ended up being a tiny bit faster than the Titan Xp. IF you have GPU (CUDA) accelerated effects on the timeline and use hardware encoding, then you might actually see 100% GPU usage during export (depends on other things though). By the way, even though the RTX 2070 on up are certified by Adobe, Premiere Pro does not currently utilize any of the new features of the Turing GPU architecture. Both of those processors are 6-core, but the 8700 is higher clocked, has Hyperthreading, and more cache. Gpu is used 90/98% during the encoding phase and cpu only 10/15%. Overall, the RTX 2070 in particular is a very solid choice for Premiere Pro as it easily keeps up with the more expensive RTX 2080 and 2080 Ti models. Based on the benchmarks it appears that DNxHR HQ gives the best performance?? First, the RTX 2080 Ti has 11GB of VRAM which can be very important if you work with 8K media. Premiere is CRAP. Not sure if that indicates anything in particular. I saw that the 2070 isn't in the supported hardware list for premiere 2019 for cuda. Starting with the non-RED footage, all the GPUs we tested (including the new RTX cards) were close to identical. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. That was true for official releases of Premiere Pro prior to 14.2, released on May 19. everything is choppy and i think integrated graphics are taking the load. Viruses don't work well with hardware ;), GTX 1080Ti or RTX 2070? Thank you so much for taking the time and effort to reply , i learnt a lot from this :). Information : When i open a project , i get the option for Cuda rendering , but even upon selecting it , my GPU is not being utilized when scrolling through the timeline or rendering , everything is choppy and i think integrated graphics are taking the load . The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super also lands in a post-AMD Navi world, where the closest competitor, both in performance and price, is … i'm building a my new pc for editing 1080p and at max 4k sequences. I just updated to the most recent driver on GeForce Experience so I can't imagine that's the issue. In the RTX 2070 review it says "but the difference between any mid/high end NVIDIA GPU is going to be very minor".